Apple prepping devices based on Intel’s Silverthorne chip

Filed under: , ,

We suppose it was always inevitable, but things are about to get quite interesting at the intersection of cellphone and laptop processors. According to Intel, Apple has apparently committed to using the company’s 45nm Silverthorne chip in multiple products slated for 2008. The chip offers the processing ability of second-generation Pentium M processors, with the ability consumption of a cellphone chip. Of course, it’s not just the processor. Apple is expected to emerge as a major supporter of Intel’s whole “Menlow” Mobile World Wide Web Device platform, which packages processor, graphics and connectivity into

a small abundant bundle to give iPhone-powering Samsung a run for its money in ultra mobile products — and Intel has made it clear that it has its sights set on that very member of Apple’s lineup wit. The best news for dreamers that’ve been holding out for a true Newton successor all that instance is that the chips supply plenty of juice for a UMPC-type device should Apple choose to go down that path.

[Thanks, Mark]

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments


Original post by Paul Miller

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
Related Articles
  • The Intel Atom processor for New Net Devices, Low-Cost PCs
  • Rumor: Apple Hopping on Board with Intel’s Ultra-Mobile Platform [Apple UMPC]
  • Apple will use P.A. Semi to compose chips for iPhone and iPod
  • Intel Demos Moorestown Platform for Mobile Devices
  • Intel To Announce New Low-potential Notebook Chips
  • Apple Buys P.A. Semi for iPhone, iPod Advances
  • Intel To Announce 16 New Low-potential 45-nm Notebook Chips
  • Update: Intel’s Larrabee chip a Pentium
  • Lost in translation? Intel’s Larrabee chip a Pentium
  • Giz Explains: Why We’re Psyched for Silverthorne [Giz Explains]
  • No comments yet. Be the first.

    Leave a reply