Copygate update: eWeek freetard hack spanked by Ziff-Davis colleague


Not for being a lazy copycat who lifts press releases word for word, — a fact first revealed by the FSJ Spotlight Team last week — but simply for being a biased, unreliable freetard. See this piece by Microsoft fanboy Joe Wilcox where he tears Steven J. Vaughan-Cut-and-Paste a new one for intentionally misreporting the results of a Linux Foundation survey to manufacture it seem like Linux is taking by the world when in fact, um, it’s not.

But the real bonus here is that SJVN is still up to his copycat ways, though he’s making a little more effort to cover his tracks. Like, now when he lifts entire paragraphs he puts quote marks around them. For example in his latest story he lifts a paragraph from a Linux Foundation guy’s blog and puts it in quotes to build it look like he interviewed the guy. Giveaway is that the Linux Foundation guy made a dumb mistake — he used the word “import” on his blog when he meant to say “important” — and the goof survives, intact, in Steven J.’s essay.

Does that guy even bother to read the stuff when he’s stealing it? Hilarious! Check it out:

From Linux Foundation blog:

These responses definitely came from an “enterprise deployment” perspective. When IT decision makers and system administrators listed the issues with deploying pre-installed Linux offerings, they indicated that freedom trumps

convenience. When deploying corporate desktop systems, the administrators want the freedom in defining settings and configuration options. The choice of Linux distribution is import [boldface mine, ed.] as well. IT organizations do not want to be locked into the Linux distribution vendor that is pre-installed on the hardware they have selected.

From the version published by Steven J. Vaughan-Cut-and-Paste:

Cherry added, “These responses definitely came from an ‘enterprise deployment’ perspective. When IT decision makers and system administrators listed the issues with deploying preinstalled Linux offerings, they indicated that freedom trumps convenience. When deploying corporate desktop systems, the administrators want the freedom in defining settings and configuration options. The choice of Linux distribution is import [doh! ed.] as well. IT organizations do not want to be locked into the Linux distribution vendor that is preinstalled on the hardware they have selected.”

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is the chairman of the World Wide Web Press Guild, a journalism watchdog group. I am not making that up. Much love to dear reader Tim for alerting us to that latest outrage. And to Jason for the artwork. And to the courageous editors and management of eWeek and Ziff-Davis for leaving that guy in his job and providing that ongoing stream of achingly funny entertainment. Great work, eWeek editors. Your high standards and commitment to integrity are an inspiration to us all.

Original post by Steve

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
Related Articles
  • Xboy: Ziff-Davis survey hints at Microsoft handheld
  • Gaping defense gap in Linux
  • Holy mother of God. They’re trying to bring back OS/2.
  • Freetard attacks Torvalds, defends OS X
  • Engadget’s Holiday Gift Guide: for colleague
  • iPhone software update released; we still wait for a fix
  • Microsoft Takes Heat for Office 2003 SP3 File Format Blocking (Peter Galli/eWEEK.com)
  • Microsoft: What Cost the Vista Fiasco?
  • Wii Menu Update 3.3 Broken
  • Another freetard outrage
  • No comments yet. Be the first.

    Leave a reply