Motion Sensors Battle: MicroElectroMechanical versus Camera

Tech-On has an interesting question: is microelectromechanical (MEMS) sensors or embedded cameras better at motion sensing? MEMS uses an acceleration and geomagnetic sensor while analyzing the image from a plain digital camera can tell us what motion the host device is performing. You probably guessed it: they are very different: cameras are very common, so the installed based is huge. However, it requires a much more

processing and is limited by the lighting conditions. My take is that in absolute terms, MEMS is better, but economic reality makes it so that both ways are being researched and used on the market. What’s do you think? Read Tech-on’s thoughts on the subject.

Permalink | Comment | Uberbargain | Uberphones

Orginal post by Rick Broida

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
Related Articles
  • JVC Full Motion Multi-Stream IP Camera sends an e-mail when trouble is detected.
  • Olympus Unveils Tap-Controlled Digital Camera
  • Adlink DPAC-1000 an intelligent remote goods acquisition controller
  • Micron carves out image-sensor division
  • Cuil Ready for a towering Battle To Match Google in Search
  • Turn your Mac into a remote activated, motion sensitive shield camera!
  • Hacked USB Interface
  • Battle of the breeze: MSI Wind vs. MacBook Air
  • Sony May Let Rival Microsoft Put Blu-ray on Xbox
  • OK that me versus Nixon thing has gone far enough
  • No comments yet. Be the first.

    Leave a reply